http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21709218-new-numbers-imf-tell-tale-two-africas-african-economies-are-growing
The Economist
" African economies are growing at very different speeds" -Oct 29th, 2016
The Economist
" African economies are growing at very different speeds" -Oct 29th, 2016
In
sub-Saharan African countries, economic growth varies as you look at different
regions. In Nigeria is currently experiencing a recession, but the Ivory Coast
is experiencing an 8% growth rate. One of the main dividing factors
contributing to this difference in growth is resources. As the prices of different
materials decrease, countries that export these materials and resources are
getting less money for them. Angola (rich in oil and one of the fastest growing
countries in Africa) will not grow at all this year, because oil prices are
lower. Commodities that are exported to China from these African countries have
halved in value in 2015. Countries that don’t rely on exporting resources to
grow the economy will grow at 5.6% this year according to the IMF. The
lesson is that countries shouldn’t rely on commodities as their only source for
economic growth, it is important to diversify. The article uses the example of
East African Countries, which have created mobile banking applications to help
them sell oil and gas. But it is important that these countries don’t rely soil
on these resources. In the example of
Angola, dropping of oil prices lowers the growth that the country sees from
exporting this commodity.
These
governments don’t have control to set commodity prices. To compensate for the
drop in commodity prices, Nigeria tried to higher its exchange rate, which
ended up hurting their economy. Countries such as Ethiopia and Malawi, which
rely on agricultural exports for income, are experiencing a drought. This relates back to our reading by Ferraro
which suggests that countries such as Ethiopia and Malawa, who make most of
their money on agricultural exports, should make sure they can feed the people
in their own country before exporting this good. If they are going through
drought, what little crop they do produce should go to feeding themselves. Many
of these countries have high rates of malnutrition even though they export
great amounts of food. Dependency theorists would say that they should use the
food produced to feed themselves first and find other ways to integrate into
the global economy.
According
to the article, growth in South Africa has slowed to almost zero. But the
problem with the projected economic growth in these countries is that it is
hard for the IMF to make these calculations, and determine how people will be
affected by economic growth or decline. Ferraro also brings up the point that
most citizens in a country may not benefit from the economic activity that is
measured. Other aspects should be measured “such as life expectancy, literacy,
infant mortality, education, and the like.” (Ferraro) The IMF and the World
Bank often overlook social, political, and cultural factors. All of these
factors contribute to the economic state of these countries, and they should
all be considered when figuring out which ways will help improve their economic
situations the best.
According
to the dependency theory, states should try to be self-reliant. In contrast to
recommendations from the IMF and the World Bank, dependency theorist think that
states should try to be more self-reliant. Greater integration into the global
economy doesn’t mean it will help the economy in these countries grow. This can
be seen in African countries which aren’t seeing economic growth, trying to
integrate them into the world economic system we have in place which revolved
around Western and Capitalist systems does not seem like the best solution to do
so. It is important that underdeveloped countries have a balance between
self-reliance and economic interactions with the world economy. They should
support interactions that help them to improve their social and economic
wellbeing (which seems difficult to do in a existing system that revolves
around developed countries).
Vincent Ferraro, "Dependency Theory: An
Introduction," in The Development Economics Reader, ed. Giorgio
Secondi (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 58-64
Hi Julia!
ReplyDeleteEnjoyed reading your post about the importance of diversifying resources in Africa. Dependency theory dictates that states should try to be self-reliant, yet wouldn't a balance between trade and development be beneficial? E.g. remember earlier in the semester when we learned about beer and pizza and how both the U.S. and Canada benefited from trade. I wonder if that could be applied to this situation...African nations face different challenges of course. Nonetheless, I agree with you that if a nation is experiencing food shortages, "what little crop they do produce should go to feeding themselves" however, economically that normally doesn't occur. Why do you think this is?
Thanks for the interesting article!
-Hattie
Hey Hattie thanks for the comment!
ReplyDeleteAs for why some farmers don't reap the benefit of the crops they grow, it may be because large corporations have control over the food industry like we saw in the film last class. Especially when they are required to grow more specific crops like coffee beans for example, which they can't feed their families with.
I do think that trade can be helpful to the development of these countries like you mentioned, but maybe on different terms where underdeveloped countries see greater benefits then they do now. I'm not exactly sure what conditions would facilitate this though.
-Julia
Hi Julia!
ReplyDeleteI really liked your post. I tend to always think trade is a good thing for an economy because it allows for diversity in products offered. I can understand now a country will find significant issues in only using their few resources within the global market, if their resources don't produce. They could rely on themselves, but the capitalistic West countries have determined that global capitalism is good for economies which is reason many participate even if it is dangerous towards their development. I feel like you could bring in Gramsci's critiques of the hegemony of global capitalism in this case too because these people have been influenced to believe this type of trade will be good for their economies even if it isn't. Do think this type of critique could be applied here as well? Thank you and great post!
Marissa Jordan
Hi Julia!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your post. I think trade would be a good route forward for these countries, but it needs to be done in a way that benefits them. Sense they are growing at different rates, and have different strengths, these must be used to their advantage, which would take serious economic planning from the private and public sector. You mentioned that the wester capitalist system is not the best thing for them, and I have to ask what you feel would be the best thing?
Again, great post.
Ben